1. What do you believe is the significance of Pythias’ note to Aristotle their first night in Pella, “warm, dry” (p. 12)? What does it reveal about Pythias’ nature and her relationship with Aristotle?
I believe she is using a double entendre that not only gives an update on the household staff which would be her "tradtional" role, but is in reality an update on his physical observations. (nod, nod, wink, wink) Not only do we see that she can read and write, the brevity without formality speaks to an intellectual and physical intimacy because she doesn't need to qualify the statement. She is showing us that she isn't submissive or self conscious. The statement shows poise, wit and a confidence in it's reception, telling me that they enjoy a more equal relationship than what I would imagine would be usual amoung her contemperaries.
Because you are the author of this blog only you can originate a new post thread. FYI
Your comments so far are super deep. Too much thinking for me right now.
I am only 15 pages in so far. I must say it has been easier to read than I thought. Honestly, I was not thrilled by the back. It seemed like it might feel like work, rather than pleasure reading. But so far so good. I like the pacing of the read and the author's voice is interesting and I like the science stuff. Made me think of Darwin more than Aristotle. I like that kind of stuff.
Alison
P.S. Were are the other comments? Only Chris so far?
I'm finding it an easier read than expected as well. No other comments yet...The rest of the questions from the reader's guide are centered around once he's working with Alexander and so I suggest that we all feel free to keep reading. I've gotten to pg 52 so far.
At their first meeting, Alexander accuses Aristotle of using Arrhidaeus as another “laurel leaf,” as proof that Aristotle is a great teacher. Is there truth in Alexander’s words? What do you believe are the motives behind Aristotle’s interest in Alexander’s brother?
Question source: Random House Reader's guide http://www.randomhouse.ca/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780307356208&view=rg
ReplyDeleteOk I'll start.
ReplyDeleteI believe she is using a double entendre that not only gives an update on the household staff which would be her "tradtional" role, but is in reality an update on his physical observations. (nod, nod, wink, wink) Not only do we see that she can read and write, the brevity without formality speaks to an intellectual and physical intimacy because she doesn't need to qualify the statement. She is showing us that she isn't submissive or self conscious. The statement shows poise, wit and a confidence in it's reception, telling me that they enjoy a more equal relationship than what I would imagine would be usual amoung her contemperaries.
Chris,
ReplyDeleteBecause you are the author of this blog only you can originate a new post thread. FYI
Your comments so far are super deep. Too much thinking for me right now.
I am only 15 pages in so far. I must say it has been easier to read than I thought. Honestly, I was not thrilled by the back. It seemed like it might feel like work, rather than pleasure reading. But so far so good. I like the pacing of the read and the author's voice is interesting and I like the science stuff. Made me think of Darwin more than Aristotle. I like that kind of stuff.
Alison
P.S. Were are the other comments? Only Chris so far?
P.S. My name comes up as Ms. Hall because I have a blog for my class as well.
ReplyDeleteI'm finding it an easier read than expected as well. No other comments yet...The rest of the questions from the reader's guide are centered around once he's working with Alexander and so I suggest that we all feel free to keep reading. I've gotten to pg 52 so far.
ReplyDeleteUne autre Ms Hall
Now I am on page 80. Still wondering what others are thinking? Maybe start a new thread Chris.
ReplyDeleteAlison
ok question 2
ReplyDeleteAt their first meeting, Alexander accuses Aristotle of using Arrhidaeus as another “laurel leaf,” as proof that Aristotle is a great teacher. Is there truth in Alexander’s words? What do you believe are the motives behind Aristotle’s interest in Alexander’s brother?